Men's Station No. 73 Uniform Pant

Lot # FP26NV
FP26
$158.95
5 out of 5 Customer Rating
  • Protection ID 1975
Color: Navy
Please select color to add to cart.
Select Waist
Please select waist to add to cart.
Select Inseam
Please select inseam to add to cart.
Availability:
  • Select Styles for Availability

Product Details

Meet the Men’s Station No. 73 Uniform Pant, designed for those who demand reliability and comfort in every shift. A contoured waistband provides a comfortable and secure fit, while extra wide belt loops offer added support.
  • Contoured waistband
  • Legs feature silicone beading for durable creases
  • Double needle felled side and seat seams offer superier durability
  • Extra wide belt loop at center back waistband
  • Two slack-style front pockets
  • Two rear welt pockets
Link to California Proposition 65
Fabric:
Body: 7 oz. (237 g/m²) Tecasafe® Flame Resistant Twill
Blend:
Body: 47% Modacrylic / 37% Lyocell / 16% Aramid
Country Origin:
Imported

Benefits

UL Certified to NFPA 1975

UL Certified to NFPA 1975

Overall rating: 1.2 / 5 from 5 reviews.

AI Generated Review Summary

Summary topics

Review topics: ["pants"].

Review highlights

Reviews

My order came unhemmed when

"My order came unhemmed when I ordered a 32x30, also the waist was extremely tight and unwearable. Because I needed the pants immediately I was unable to process a refund or even get that ball rolling so I had to take a loss on over 100$."

— Robert F. (2/5)

Don't buy!!! These Station No. 73 fade extremely quick.

"Station No. 73 line fades in about 3 months. Don't waste your money like I did."

— Dan (1/5)

Could be better

"I have been in these pants for over 3 years now at a career 48/96 fire department. These are the standard issue pants where I work. I was part of the selection process for this uniform so I can say style and comfort were not the selling points of this selection. Fortunately they have been available to order consistently through our supply chains, priced on the affordable side when you think about the specific industry market options out there. Unfortunately, of the 60+ people or so I have put in them, or tried to put in them, the general consensus is as follows. The seat is too shallow from the waist to the crotch they ride low to not be constricting, but can quickly snug up in areas that you need to pull them out of. Also leaving out parts of a person's behind hanging out. The seams are pretty weak, we have a fair share of guys that blow out the seam in the middle of the rear, or the bottom of the crotch in normal daily wear. The stitching around the cargo pocket seams are of poor design and often rip on the front side where to the pocket cover meets the pocket itself. The front of the pocket cover is fixed down to the pocket by stitching. The material in its entirety is subject to easy ripping around corners, and environment things like cactus or truck parts. I say this in comparison to regular jeans such as Levi brand or bulwarks normal jean FR pants (i have worn those about 7 years ago). The leg silicone beading for creases that they advertise on the website has not shown up on the 300 or so pants I have ordered. Mistake? I have had to upsize for people in the past so that the seat and thigh fit better, but then it leaves the waist oversized."

— Sam S. (1/5)

Seams ripping.

"Seams started ripping after 1 light use. Poor stitching quality and durability especially for a $100+ pair of pants. Would not recommend to anyone considering"

— Adam C. (1/5)

Seams ripping.

"Seams started ripping after 1 light use. Poor stitching quality and durability especially for a $100+ pair of pants. Would not recommend to anyone considering"

— Adam C. (1/5)

Q&A